<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credibility Returns to Paranormal Themed Television: Introducing &#8220;Ghost Lab&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/</link>
	<description>An eye on the paranormal world in today's popular culture.  Articles refer to news about paranormal groups, TV shows and appearances by the leading ghost hunters in the field.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:12:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>&#039;Paranormal investigation&#039;, &#039;reality TV&#039; and &#039;credibility&#039;... three things that do not belong in the same sentence.  Blatant confirmation bias; lack of ANY demonstrative scientific method; obvious digital manipulation (why add noise to a HD video signal?); and slack-jawed yokels who jump at their own shadow and squeal like girls in the dark.  NONE of these things belong on a channel or network that claims to have a basis in scientific advancement (Discovery Networks).  If it must be televised, market it to the SyFy channel.  This show is utter garbage and has absolutely no basis in any credible science.  It is cringe-worthy.

Congratulations on lowering the bar on scientific education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Paranormal investigation&#8217;, &#8216;reality TV&#8217; and &#8216;credibility&#8217;&#8230; three things that do not belong in the same sentence.  Blatant confirmation bias; lack of ANY demonstrative scientific method; obvious digital manipulation (why add noise to a HD video signal?); and slack-jawed yokels who jump at their own shadow and squeal like girls in the dark.  NONE of these things belong on a channel or network that claims to have a basis in scientific advancement (Discovery Networks).  If it must be televised, market it to the SyFy channel.  This show is utter garbage and has absolutely no basis in any credible science.  It is cringe-worthy.</p>
<p>Congratulations on lowering the bar on scientific education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>Good comments, Bobby.  I suppose we also have to recognise that just because one of these TV shows fakes ONE incident, it doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that ALL their incidents are faked. Similarly when a  skeptic reacts to an  incident  by saying something like \this noise COULD have been made by a passing train\ or \we were unable to confirm where every crew member was when the stone got thrown\, they are just stating another POSSIBILITY - much the same as saying  \it COULD have been the spirit of Abraham Lincoln that spoke and threw the stone\.  Its a bit of a catch 22 - the believers cannot prove it, and the skeptics usually  cannot disprove it.  Mind you - I don&#039;t know how David Blaine \levitates\ himself during his street magic,  but I&#039;d be willing to bet my mortgage that its an illusion and not real, despite the passers-by freaking out on camera to add to the effect  !!   But as a TV viewer, I can&#039;t actually  prove that he isn&#039;t  levitating !!      So if TV companies can go to the expense and bother of creating an illusion that everyone knows is not possible, the precedent is set to make ghostie programs that go overboard on the screaming and tapping to help create the illusion.   No wonder some of the investigators on this site reckon it gives them a bad name !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments, Bobby.  I suppose we also have to recognise that just because one of these TV shows fakes ONE incident, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that ALL their incidents are faked. Similarly when a  skeptic reacts to an  incident  by saying something like \this noise COULD have been made by a passing train\ or \we were unable to confirm where every crew member was when the stone got thrown\, they are just stating another POSSIBILITY &#8211; much the same as saying  \it COULD have been the spirit of Abraham Lincoln that spoke and threw the stone\.  Its a bit of a catch 22 &#8211; the believers cannot prove it, and the skeptics usually  cannot disprove it.  Mind you &#8211; I don&#8217;t know how David Blaine \levitates\ himself during his street magic,  but I&#8217;d be willing to bet my mortgage that its an illusion and not real, despite the passers-by freaking out on camera to add to the effect  !!   But as a TV viewer, I can&#8217;t actually  prove that he isn&#8217;t  levitating !!      So if TV companies can go to the expense and bother of creating an illusion that everyone knows is not possible, the precedent is set to make ghostie programs that go overboard on the screaming and tapping to help create the illusion.   No wonder some of the investigators on this site reckon it gives them a bad name !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Kenneth.

I agree with you on the &quot;theory&quot; related on most paranormal shows about spirits needed some type of energy to manifest.  I always wonder who the &quot;they&quot; are when they say &quot;they say...&quot; .  I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s just been repeated instances of drained batteries and then someone seeing a shape begin to form or the fact that people claim to feel a cold chill before hearing or seeing something.  I have always wondered how that theory came about and who started it. There really hasn&#039;t been any official or proven experiments supporting that, just experiences from different investigators that have collectively formed this theory that everyone has come to take as almost fact.  I&#039;ve also wondered, &quot;what are they??&quot; many times.  Is it actually old Aunt Martha that is still in her room and talking to you or is it just a bumping of time planes that are overlapping for a short moment or is it, like you said, actually extra-terrestrials making things move and making noises and voices.  Some might think the ET theory is way over the top but isn&#039;t believing Aunt Martha is still talking to you just as believable?  Any of these theories could be true. Yet none, or any other, has been even remotely and positively proven.  Everything is based on experiences, recordings, and beliefs by every paranormal investigator everywhere.  

There are actually brainiac groups of &quot;scientists&quot; that study quantum theories and parapsychology in an effort to not only explain the whole ghost thing but the unexplainable that can&#039;t be answered.  The everyday investigator, like most everyone in paranormal groups,  provide root-level &quot;evidence&quot; that can possibly help one day to prove one way or another about ghosts existing.  

Like you, I&#039;ve wondered how people who believe in a god can look for answers that could contradict what they believe religiously.  What if a spirit actually appeared publicly and stated &quot;God?, what God?&quot; .  Imagine the consequences if that happened?  

Being a skeptic like you said is a good thing.  Makes for a better arguement if or when a good recording or image is captured.  Especially when the voice or image cannot be explained.  For example, when a female voice is recorded when there were only men around.  Or vice versa. Or maybe when the voice heard is spoken in a different language than English.  Even skeptics have to scratch their heads and wonder &quot; where the hell DID that come from??&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Kenneth.</p>
<p>I agree with you on the &#8220;theory&#8221; related on most paranormal shows about spirits needed some type of energy to manifest.  I always wonder who the &#8220;they&#8221; are when they say &#8220;they say&#8230;&#8221; .  I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s just been repeated instances of drained batteries and then someone seeing a shape begin to form or the fact that people claim to feel a cold chill before hearing or seeing something.  I have always wondered how that theory came about and who started it. There really hasn&#8217;t been any official or proven experiments supporting that, just experiences from different investigators that have collectively formed this theory that everyone has come to take as almost fact.  I&#8217;ve also wondered, &#8220;what are they??&#8221; many times.  Is it actually old Aunt Martha that is still in her room and talking to you or is it just a bumping of time planes that are overlapping for a short moment or is it, like you said, actually extra-terrestrials making things move and making noises and voices.  Some might think the ET theory is way over the top but isn&#8217;t believing Aunt Martha is still talking to you just as believable?  Any of these theories could be true. Yet none, or any other, has been even remotely and positively proven.  Everything is based on experiences, recordings, and beliefs by every paranormal investigator everywhere.  </p>
<p>There are actually brainiac groups of &#8220;scientists&#8221; that study quantum theories and parapsychology in an effort to not only explain the whole ghost thing but the unexplainable that can&#8217;t be answered.  The everyday investigator, like most everyone in paranormal groups,  provide root-level &#8220;evidence&#8221; that can possibly help one day to prove one way or another about ghosts existing.  </p>
<p>Like you, I&#8217;ve wondered how people who believe in a god can look for answers that could contradict what they believe religiously.  What if a spirit actually appeared publicly and stated &#8220;God?, what God?&#8221; .  Imagine the consequences if that happened?  </p>
<p>Being a skeptic like you said is a good thing.  Makes for a better arguement if or when a good recording or image is captured.  Especially when the voice or image cannot be explained.  For example, when a female voice is recorded when there were only men around.  Or vice versa. Or maybe when the voice heard is spoken in a different language than English.  Even skeptics have to scratch their heads and wonder &#8221; where the hell DID that come from??&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion folks.

I have no axe to grind one way or the other as far as shows like  GH or EP is concerned. On the other hand, Most Haunted has shown just how much money can be made out of public interest in the whole paranormal subject.  Despite blatant fakery and downright skulduggery to obtain &quot;incidents&quot;, their ability to keep a large loyal following buying DVDs and merchandise is amazing. Perhaps they&#039;ve just tapped into the deep-rooted desire of humanity to understand where we came from and where we&#039;re going ?  But it seems to be a loyal following who don&#039;t ask too many questions - or maybe entertainemnt is more important to them than knowledge.

Jason and Grant (and other shows) keep explaining to the camera  - &quot; Some people believe spirits manifest themselves by drawing energy from the air or surroundings&quot;   OK - seems sort of logical.  But wait a minute - aren&#039;t they making a basic assumption that spirits EXIST in the first place ?  And just  HOW do they  convert heat energy into noise or light  ?   And actually ... just what are THEY (the &quot;spirits&quot;) in the first place ?   Where is the official science that even  suggests THEY exist ? Where is the official science that says THEY are the continuing energy of dead people ? 

Is it any less likely that THEY could be some extra-terrestrial intelligence ?  Can&#039;t  prove that ... or disprove it.   But in the same way, science has been unable to prove or disprove the spirit theories either.

Just think - an invisible energy that can switch TVs on and off , and move stuff around ?   Wow - wouldn&#039;t the power companies want to get their hands on that kind of knowledge ?

So humanity is really  no further forward, despite the interesting claims of Lisa here.  Let&#039;s hope EP can contribute something worthwhile to the science - but TV money and science don&#039;t mix well. 
 
If such science existed - and it showed just HOW some aspect of dead people can still exist on this physical planet -  it would turn the whole existence of HUMANITY on its head.   Not only would it mean that people&#039;s soul COULD lived on, it would likely lead to the possibility of re-incarnation (adopting the soul of someone who lived previously). 

What would that do to religion and the concept of God ?
  
As a skeptic, I&#039;d love to see science makes RFEAL advances in proving the existence of intelligent entities that we cannot see.  So I say - its great that we get some EVP noises and the occasional IR shape... but all it proves is that the &quot;experience&quot;  could be shared, and can&#039;t be dismissed as one person having imagined it.   But having caught these things on tape, why is there no REAL science then investigating them further.  Even just to explain how it is possible to get noise on a blank tape/disc ?

Who can really take this stuff forward ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion folks.</p>
<p>I have no axe to grind one way or the other as far as shows like  GH or EP is concerned. On the other hand, Most Haunted has shown just how much money can be made out of public interest in the whole paranormal subject.  Despite blatant fakery and downright skulduggery to obtain &#8220;incidents&#8221;, their ability to keep a large loyal following buying DVDs and merchandise is amazing. Perhaps they&#8217;ve just tapped into the deep-rooted desire of humanity to understand where we came from and where we&#8217;re going ?  But it seems to be a loyal following who don&#8217;t ask too many questions &#8211; or maybe entertainemnt is more important to them than knowledge.</p>
<p>Jason and Grant (and other shows) keep explaining to the camera  &#8211; &#8221; Some people believe spirits manifest themselves by drawing energy from the air or surroundings&#8221;   OK &#8211; seems sort of logical.  But wait a minute &#8211; aren&#8217;t they making a basic assumption that spirits EXIST in the first place ?  And just  HOW do they  convert heat energy into noise or light  ?   And actually &#8230; just what are THEY (the &#8220;spirits&#8221;) in the first place ?   Where is the official science that even  suggests THEY exist ? Where is the official science that says THEY are the continuing energy of dead people ? </p>
<p>Is it any less likely that THEY could be some extra-terrestrial intelligence ?  Can&#8217;t  prove that &#8230; or disprove it.   But in the same way, science has been unable to prove or disprove the spirit theories either.</p>
<p>Just think &#8211; an invisible energy that can switch TVs on and off , and move stuff around ?   Wow &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t the power companies want to get their hands on that kind of knowledge ?</p>
<p>So humanity is really  no further forward, despite the interesting claims of Lisa here.  Let&#8217;s hope EP can contribute something worthwhile to the science &#8211; but TV money and science don&#8217;t mix well. </p>
<p>If such science existed &#8211; and it showed just HOW some aspect of dead people can still exist on this physical planet &#8211;  it would turn the whole existence of HUMANITY on its head.   Not only would it mean that people&#8217;s soul COULD lived on, it would likely lead to the possibility of re-incarnation (adopting the soul of someone who lived previously). </p>
<p>What would that do to religion and the concept of God ?</p>
<p>As a skeptic, I&#8217;d love to see science makes RFEAL advances in proving the existence of intelligent entities that we cannot see.  So I say &#8211; its great that we get some EVP noises and the occasional IR shape&#8230; but all it proves is that the &#8220;experience&#8221;  could be shared, and can&#8217;t be dismissed as one person having imagined it.   But having caught these things on tape, why is there no REAL science then investigating them further.  Even just to explain how it is possible to get noise on a blank tape/disc ?</p>
<p>Who can really take this stuff forward ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>I guess your ghosts are better than my ghosts, Joe.  Let&#039;s just leave it at that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess your ghosts are better than my ghosts, Joe.  Let&#8217;s just leave it at that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>DJB, for someone that wants to get this right you sure messed it up.  Unless Lisa Simon is a member now, the only statement about EP is the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph.  

Lisa, per your last paragraph, if I have done a review of data and found nothing, it means I found nothing that met my standards and you saying you could find so much more in it just proves my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DJB, for someone that wants to get this right you sure messed it up.  Unless Lisa Simon is a member now, the only statement about EP is the last sentence of the 2nd paragraph.  </p>
<p>Lisa, per your last paragraph, if I have done a review of data and found nothing, it means I found nothing that met my standards and you saying you could find so much more in it just proves my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2436</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2436</guid>
		<description>I am sorry Joe, that you have not have had the success that I have had when investigating.  That must be extremely frustrating for you and your group.  First let start out by my telling you I was solo for many years in my investigating.  And for the record, I don&#039;t ascribe to the notion that all little balls of lights are orbs, nor have I taken any out of focus pic&#039;s and called them
&quot;Evidence&quot;.  And I do not have to justify myself to anyone, all my purpose is to relay my experiences, and perhaps someone will learn from them.

And for the record, my expectatons are quite high, higher than most.  And I don&#039;t go bashing other investigators, when I don&#039;t know a thing about them or their technique.  It is when I see &#039;evidence&#039; fabricated for entertainemnt purposes, is when I might speak up.

We are all here to learn from each other, not outdo one another, Joe.  I can 100% guarantee however, that if you were to send me a recording you may have done at an investigation, and you thought there was nothing captured, I&#039;d find that there was a lot more there than you ever could have realized was there.  I say this with having 100% confidence at what I do , and the results I get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry Joe, that you have not have had the success that I have had when investigating.  That must be extremely frustrating for you and your group.  First let start out by my telling you I was solo for many years in my investigating.  And for the record, I don&#8217;t ascribe to the notion that all little balls of lights are orbs, nor have I taken any out of focus pic&#8217;s and called them<br />
&#8220;Evidence&#8221;.  And I do not have to justify myself to anyone, all my purpose is to relay my experiences, and perhaps someone will learn from them.</p>
<p>And for the record, my expectatons are quite high, higher than most.  And I don&#8217;t go bashing other investigators, when I don&#8217;t know a thing about them or their technique.  It is when I see &#8216;evidence&#8217; fabricated for entertainemnt purposes, is when I might speak up.</p>
<p>We are all here to learn from each other, not outdo one another, Joe.  I can 100% guarantee however, that if you were to send me a recording you may have done at an investigation, and you thought there was nothing captured, I&#8217;d find that there was a lot more there than you ever could have realized was there.  I say this with having 100% confidence at what I do , and the results I get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djb</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2435</link>
		<dc:creator>djb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2435</guid>
		<description>Hey Joe, let me get this right.  You are accusing Everyday Paranormal of presenting &quot;orbs&quot;  and motion blur photos as evidence? Perhaps you would like to present some proof where they have done that?

Taking that approach I can look at the jolietparanormal.com web site and see the Cryptozoology page and dismiss your group as a bunch of &quot;big foot loonies&quot;.

Be prepared to back up what you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joe, let me get this right.  You are accusing Everyday Paranormal of presenting &#8220;orbs&#8221;  and motion blur photos as evidence? Perhaps you would like to present some proof where they have done that?</p>
<p>Taking that approach I can look at the jolietparanormal.com web site and see the Cryptozoology page and dismiss your group as a bunch of &#8220;big foot loonies&#8221;.</p>
<p>Be prepared to back up what you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2433</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2433</guid>
		<description>I have to go back and address that John Wilkes Booth EVP.  That is a class B at best and is nowhere close to a class A.  I have captured several Class A EVPs and all of them sound like human voices clearly saying something with no need of being cleaned up.  Once you have &quot;cleaned&quot; something up to the point that all that is left is that tinny warble, you have drastically altered the recording.
These shows are nothing more than entertainment.  The TAPS boys have been called out several times now, most likely due to a clause in their contract that allows Pilgrim to recreate any experience not captured on video.  That means a lot of what is shown are, at best, recreations of personal experiences.  The Klinge bros. are just too quick to jump on things and pronounce them paranormal.
I think Lisa&#039;s post on the 18th is very telling.  If you walk away from  most investigations with evidence of activity then your standards and criteria for what is paranormal is very low.  I would bet money that your group accepts orbs as evidence as well as out of focus photos displaying motion blur.  We have walked away from places with nothing even though we have been there a dozen times before and had a numerous experiences and pieces of data collected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to go back and address that John Wilkes Booth EVP.  That is a class B at best and is nowhere close to a class A.  I have captured several Class A EVPs and all of them sound like human voices clearly saying something with no need of being cleaned up.  Once you have &#8220;cleaned&#8221; something up to the point that all that is left is that tinny warble, you have drastically altered the recording.<br />
These shows are nothing more than entertainment.  The TAPS boys have been called out several times now, most likely due to a clause in their contract that allows Pilgrim to recreate any experience not captured on video.  That means a lot of what is shown are, at best, recreations of personal experiences.  The Klinge bros. are just too quick to jump on things and pronounce them paranormal.<br />
I think Lisa&#8217;s post on the 18th is very telling.  If you walk away from  most investigations with evidence of activity then your standards and criteria for what is paranormal is very low.  I would bet money that your group accepts orbs as evidence as well as out of focus photos displaying motion blur.  We have walked away from places with nothing even though we have been there a dozen times before and had a numerous experiences and pieces of data collected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.spectralreview.com/2009/08/24/credibility-returns-to-paranormal-themed-television-introducing-ghost-lab/comment-page-2/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spectralreview.com/?p=1300#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Again, I&#039;m forced to agree with Bobby on this one. I&#039;ve not seen anything on their show that others haven&#039;t already used. They have a big fancy truck with the words &quot;Ghost Lab&quot; printed on the side. Inside I&#039;ve only seen them use those hugh computers for analyzing EVP&#039;s they&#039;ve captured, which can be done with any laptop or computer, and I&#039;ve seen them analyzing objects moving, which can be done with any video camera. Best equipment, I think not. Luckiest ghost hunters alive seems more like it, but I&#039;m leaning towards complete bs. Failed to watch this week&#039;s episode, can anyone tell me if they caught an actual ghost playing cards with them yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I&#8217;m forced to agree with Bobby on this one. I&#8217;ve not seen anything on their show that others haven&#8217;t already used. They have a big fancy truck with the words &#8220;Ghost Lab&#8221; printed on the side. Inside I&#8217;ve only seen them use those hugh computers for analyzing EVP&#8217;s they&#8217;ve captured, which can be done with any laptop or computer, and I&#8217;ve seen them analyzing objects moving, which can be done with any video camera. Best equipment, I think not. Luckiest ghost hunters alive seems more like it, but I&#8217;m leaning towards complete bs. Failed to watch this week&#8217;s episode, can anyone tell me if they caught an actual ghost playing cards with them yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
